April 11, 2006

Thank God for Graduation

If you haven't seen it already, head over to this link ASAP. There you will find the final draft of LeTourneau University's Quality Enhancement Plan.

I have endeavored for the past semester and a half to comprehend just what it's all about, with little success. Everything anyone could tell me about our QEP sounded like meaningless business-speak (Christian Leadership Distinctives, anyone?). Only now, as I see the entire disastrous canker-sore that is this idea laid out before me do I truly understand:

The goal of the Quality Enhancement Plan is nothing less than the replacement of legitimate academic pursuits with pure, grade-A BS material such as the #@!$ I had to put up with from Dr. K in my capstone course last fall.

I don't understand. There are intelligent people that I like and respect on the committee that dreamed this up, including the chair. Why do they not comprehend that this is the worst idea ever?

To get specific, the QEP has basically chosen (from, apparently, several candidates) a theme for LeTourneau University. That theme is "The Five Christian Leadership Distinctives." (I can't help but wonder what the other candidates were . . . Ponies? The Bell Tower? Ingenuity?) They will now proceed to saturate us beyond the breaking point with their chosen theme.

What's that you say? We're saturated already? Plagued by the five gloopy inanities on every single syllabus and waving at us from freaking banners that blanket the campus, it's no wonder you think that. But you're wrong . . . so very wrong. Here's how. Implementation Strategies:

1) Faculty Development -- Goal 1: Faculty will increase their awareness of the five Christian Leadership Distinctives. Goal 2: Faculty will participate in professional development activities that foster the use of the Christian Leadership Distinctives in classroom instruction. Goal 3: Faculty will undergo training in the design of classroom assignments that can be incorporated into the student ePortfolio.

I weep for my professors. Truly.

2) Curricular Integration -- Goal 1: The Cornerstones course for traditional students and the Introduction to Team Learning course for nontraditional students will lay the curricular foundation for the understanding and integration of the Christian Leadership Distinctives. Goal 2: Each School offering traditional programs will identify multiple courses throughout the curriculum in selected major(s) for the integration of the Christian Leadership Distinctives. Goal 3: Students will engage in a variety of classroom activities that further their understanding of the Christian Leadership Distinctives. Goal 4: The School of Graduate and Professional studies will incorporate the Christian Leadership Distinctives into all Business courses in the online BBA core program.

This is the real kicker. Whereas before all of our teachers were required to merely slop the five limp-noodle mantras onto their syllabi, they will now be required to come up with actual classroom lesson plans that integrate them into the course teachings. For instance, Watson may now need to give a lecture on Collaborating Service in "English Literature II." Johnson may have to assign a report about Discovering Purpose in "Texas and the American West." Hood may be required to organize a group activity around Deepening Skills for "Revelation."

3) Student ePortfolios -- Goal 1: The ePortfolio will be introduced in the Cornerstones course for traditional students, and in the Introduction to Team Learning course for nontraditional students in the online BBA core program. Goal 2: Students in traditional programs will produce and continue to update their ePortfolios throughout their course of study. Goal 3: Each School offering traditional programs will identify one or two mid-level and one or two upper-level courses that will incorporate the ePortfolio. Goal 4: The School of Graduate and Professional Studies will implement the ePortfolio in each course throughout the online BBA core program.

Lest this sound like it might be a good idea, this is not about compiling a nice folder of the best papers or projects in your field which you produce during your time here. Specific upper-level courses within your major will now require you to produce additional material relating to your life goals which will then be added to your portfolio. The process begins in Cornerstones.

My Development
In the following five sections (each one corresponds to a specific Christian Leadership Distinctive) you should reflect on what you have learned. You should have a minimum of two paragraphs in each section, although most will require more length to cover both required and desired information.

Discovering Purpose:
Discuss your calling and vision as you currently understand it. First, answer the
following questions: Who has God created you to be? What has God called you to do, both corporately and individually? How can you begin to prepare for and practice that calling while you are a student at LeTourneau University? Second, based on your responses to the above questions, write a personal vision statement that is no more than two sentences in length. Third, reflect on the beliefs, values, and experiences that helped to shape your vision statement, and address the following questions: How does this vision statement give meaning and direction to your life activities? How does the process of discovering purpose, including your current understanding of your vision, shape or guide your development in each of the four Cornerstones (personal, intellectual, spiritual, and relational)?

Grounding Values:
You should include a reflection concerning your worldview, faith journey, and a discussion of the ethical values that you will use in your life. How does the process of grounding values—including your worldview, faith journey, and ethics--shape or guide your development in each of the four Cornerstones (personal, intellectual, spiritual, and relational)?

Broadening Knowledge:
Examine how you have grown personally, intellectually, spiritually, and relationally through the courses that you have been taking at LeTourneau University.

Deepening Skills:
Reflect on how courses that you have taken that apply to your major have affected your personal, intellectual, spiritual, and relational development as a professional in your discipline.

Collaborating Service:
Examine what you have learned as a result of service to the community (such as the Cornerstones service project), your church, or the campus community. How do these experiences shape or guide your personal, intellectual, spiritual, and relational development? What service activities will you investigate or become involved in while a student at LeTourneau University?

My Documents
There are three subsections to the My Documents area of the ePortfolio: personal documents, academic documents, and professional documents. In each of these three areas, you should include a section concerning your goals, strengths & assets, obstacles & challenges, and action plans. In other words, you will create a Personal Success Plan that you will include in the Personal Documents section of the ePortfolio. You will create an Academic Success Plan that you will include in the Academic Documents section of the ePortfolio. You will create a Professional Success Plan that you will include in the Professional Documents section of the ePortfolio.

There's a lot more worthy of discussion in this document (which runs to 79 pages in length), but that should be enough to get started. Please, if you are (or ever have been or ESPECIALLY ever will be) a student here, go take a look and decide what sort of response feels appropriate. Thank God I finished coursework here before this hit the fan, because I have to say, beginning a university education at a school that operates like we're about to start operating looks about as appealing as testicular cancer from where I'm sitting.

Discuss.

Posted by Jared at April 11, 2006 02:54 AM | TrackBack
Comments

I'm so happy I'm away from this. I feel truly sorry for incoming Frosh. And the profs who have to pretend to like this $!#@.

Posted by: Vengeful Cynic at April 11, 2006 08:15 AM

I'm sorry, but what, really are they trying to accomplish? The only reasoning given in the QEP Rationale (pg 4) is:

"The goal of the LeTourneau University Quality enhancement Plan is to integrate the five
Christian Leadership Distinctives throughout LeTourneau University’s academic experience."

They then say this in even more official, business-y speak in the QEP Mission Statement (pg 4), but this time assert that this will enhance learning:

"The mission of the LeTourneau University Quality Enhancement Plan is to enhance student learning
through the integration of the Christian Leadership Distinctives into the academic life of the institution."

Now, I have never pretended to understand what motivates people in "top management" in any establishment, except money. In a corporation, the "top management" makes its terrible blunders (like laying off 10% of their workforce while at the same time developing a new "working together" scheme that requires their employees to spend 10% of their time doing paperwork, thereby increasing their workload by a good 20%). What puzzles me even more in this case is that money, allegedly, has nothing to do with it, and if it does, they certainly won't admit to it.

"Top management" in "Christian" institutions has always struck me as an oxymoron. "Top management" is an exercise in beuracracy and self-aggrandization, which is the opposite of what Christian leadership is supposed to be about. Furthermore, I can't begin to understand how this QEP benefits ANYONE. The dubious worth of the Christian Leadership Distinctives notwithstanding, how does shoveling them down the throats of your students who are trying to learn, say, Engineering, and requiring their already over-worked, under-paid professors to do more work that doesn't relate to their subjects at all benefit anyone?

When even the leader-speak in the QEP can't pretend to support a meaningful reason for integrating the CLDs into every facet of a student's life, how can anyone pretend that this is a good thing?

Any passive support I might have lent LeTourneau University in the past has just gone right out the window. What started as a good Christian establishment is devolving into a cult of goody-goodies led by misguided, self-serving businessmen who care less about the Christianity of their students than they do about the size of their own SUVs.

Posted by: Toad at April 11, 2006 08:51 AM

The worst part? If, say, a Student Senator were to voice serious concerns about the overall worth of this, at the least, he would be ignored; at the worst, he could possibly be asked to leave Senate or some such. Ok, ok, I don't know that, but call it a gut instinct...What can we do?

Posted by: Knight's Disciple at April 11, 2006 09:12 AM

What can we do? Absolutely nothing. Personally, though, I'd get myself kicked off Senate if that's what I got for speaking out against it.

Posted by: Toad at April 11, 2006 12:34 PM

Hm. That'd be the way to go out with a bang. But it might also get me kicked out of the apartments, or lose my scholarship or something...which I really don't want.

Posted by: Knight's Disciple at April 11, 2006 02:13 PM

See, I'd eat that, too, because if they're going to be that petty about it, I really don't care about staying. Your credits will transfer someplace that doesn't hate itself.

Posted by: Toad at April 11, 2006 06:12 PM

I've gotta go with Sharpton. At the end of year 3, getting yourself kicked out is a Bad Idea. And really, since speaking out against the thing won't do you any good... well... go burn something instead. Maybe some ivy or something.

Posted by: Vengeful Cynic at April 12, 2006 07:11 AM

See, I'm not saying that he should, necessarily. I'm saying that, were I in his position, I probably would, and suffer the consequences if they came around. But yes, there are definitely reasons to just sit out your last year without risking any trouble, and that choice is up to Sharpton to make. :)

Posted by: Toad at April 12, 2006 08:11 AM

My own idea about all this is to keep up the dialogue about this. Keep people talking about the QEP, keep bringing it up in whatever company. Over time you will bring more and more people into the conversation, including many professors and probably (eventually) even previewers. People will be continuing to think about and prepare for when this shows up, again including professors, and it could have an impact on two things: 1) Enforcement, i.e. will the professors let the whole thing slide as long as LeTourneau isn't holding a gun to their backs? 2) Student attitudes and compliance. It might just get the oversight committee busy modifying a few things, who knows? Either way, I want certain people on it to catch on to how we feel.

I'm so sad that I can't fire off an editorial about this . . . :(

Posted by: Blame Jared at April 12, 2006 10:09 AM

Just a note on the movie list: I was interested to see the fisher king getting a respectable mark. I always liked that movie though I often wondered if I should be ashamed to like it so much (certtainly a bit contrieved in places and ...well it is a robin williams flick). Any way...I concur with your rating.

Posted by: fry at April 19, 2006 12:49 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?





Enter the number to post: