The state of Texas will be voting on a number of state constitutional amendments in November. The most well-known of the proposed amendments is Prop. 2. The description of the bill is:
The constitutional amendment providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage. (source)
Those of you who know me also know my own feelings toward this, and I have explained those feelings on this blog before. It should be of no surprise that I will be voting against this amendment. I would be voting against if the amendment only banned same-sex marriage, but it's inclusion of anything "similar to marriage" is enough for me to oppose this vocally before voting.
That phrase is open to all kinds of interpretation, and I, quite frankly, don't like any of them.
Posted by Randy at October 27, 2005 12:10 PM | TrackBack"...prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage."
I concur.
That is a very poorly worded constitutional amendment, and although I'm not in favor of legitimizing the practice of same-sex marriages, the "identical or similar to marriage" phrase is a turn off for me and is sufficient grounds in my judgement to cast a nay vote, even though the goal is admirable.
Posted by: Paul at October 28, 2005 01:19 AMI'll be frank: I think I would vote against this bill. That phrase scares me. Granted, I'm very paranoid, but still. I can just see someone twisting that to some political end, and declaring all marriages null and void in the state. Yeah. Of course, I'm not a TX resident, so it doesn't much matter.
Posted by: Knight's Disciple at October 28, 2005 09:29 AMOn second thought however, the intent of Proposition II is quite clear and present.
Posted by: Paul at November 13, 2005 02:14 AM