I do not like censorship. I hate it. I can't stand people who insist on fast-forwarding through scenes with "objectionable" content. It irritates me when words in CDs and movies are "bleeped" or muted. I heard a story just yesterday of a guy on my floor who tried to speed through the part of The Shining with the old naked lady getting out of a bathtub.
Because of this, items such as this DVD player annoy me. It basically lets the user select a level of filtering for certain movies. The company has around 500 filters available at the moment.
I can understand a parent using this tool for monitoring what their children watch in movies. However, that is the only practical use for it that I can see. If an adult wants to watch a movie and objects to certain content, he should check to see if the movie has any of that material. For example, if a person strongly objects to large amounts of violence, he should know to stay far away from either of the Kill Bill movies.
Except in extreme cases, "objectionable" content such as nudity, sex, violence, and strong language add something to a movie. It is a part of the director's artistic vision for the movie. Strong language adds an element of realism to the majority of an audience. Violence has always been a form of entertainment (boxing, anyone?). Sexual content can add a strong element of passion to a movie. Naturally, swearing just for the sake of swearing and adding nudity to a film in order to produce lust in the audience typically ruins any attempted effect at realism or passion.
I respect people who do not wish to see or hear these things for one (good) reason or another. However, I do not believe that my viewing experience should be altered for someone who could either close his eyes or not try to watch the film in the first place.
Posted by Randy at April 18, 2004 11:16 PM | TrackBackI'll spend my pennies somewhere else. Perhaps on another damn good zombie movie.
Posted by: Hookah at April 19, 2004 12:12 AMthe camp my bro works at has a filter on the player in the staff lounge. my bro in law unplugged it after it censored somebody's last name. it was amusing in it's own way, but over the top for filtering.
Posted by: banana at April 19, 2004 02:10 AMok so now we know what randy does not like; my question is why does censorship bother you so much randy?? personal entertainment versus personal morality morality wins in my book. so what if it is not what you like; is the importance of your viewing experience greater than the hard choice someone who has a moral conscience made. I agree that a person who does not wish to see with a voilence or nudity should not subjct themselves to movies that contain it. My final statement is retrieve the lunare modual component by midnight or the girl dies.
Posted by: JadEmonkY at April 20, 2004 03:16 PMMr. Pearson,
You are a very strange individual.
Besides, you are making the assumption that all nudity, violence, and sexual content is immoral. That last sentence makes it impossible for me to take anything before it seriously, anyway.
Posted by: Randy at April 20, 2004 04:40 PM